Welcome to the Sick Marketing Support.

User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
    1. Unchecked Packets... Details »»

      Unchecked Packets...

      Version: , by (Moderator/Coder) 1buckplr is offline
      Coder Last Online: Dec 2012 Show Printable Version Email this Page
      Category: Packet List
      vB Version: Unknown Rating:  Installs: 2
      Released: 03-03-2011 Last Update: Never Downloads: 0
      No support by the Coder.

      May aswell get deleted, or not uploaded in the first place.


      I'm not going to go on a rant, I havent got that kind of time nowadays to keep checking up on it all but I've had a quick browse through the free packets that have been coming in recently and all I can see is it is dissapointing.


      Not mentioning anyone in particular, and I have sent PMs to a few people,

      If you havent actually tested your packet in sick submitter please dont upload it.


      If a packet has less than 50% success after its first day of being shared, that is likely a packet that hasnt been tested.


      Please test your packets first, or there is no point in uploading them at all.

      Show Your Support

      • This Packet may not be copied, reproduced or published elsewhere without coder's permission.
  1. #2
    Expired


    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    263
    Reputation Points
    284
    Mentioned in
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    70
    Thanks (Received)
    24
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Thank you for bringing this up.

  2. #3


    lilbeewee runs:

    Sick Submitter Sick Agent

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,649
    Reputation Points
    7325
    Mentioned in
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    618
    Thanks (Received)
    674
    Likes (Given)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Really? I didn't think it was that bad. There's been a few free big packets added lately.
    If a packet has less than 50% success after its first day of being shared, that is likely a packet that hasnt been tested.
    What do you mean tested? Surely all packets are ran through the dupe checker?

    I u/l my first Submitter Packet the other day. 462 100% Dupe Free PHPLD Directories
    But I had thought there had been some half decent big sized free packets added recently. More than was added last month. Admitedly though I've not tried them all as I've been too busy with link dirs recently.

    What are you saying though that people need to upload better packets?
    Get the Sick Agent Templates Bundle
    40+ Templates for Agent for virtually most platforms
    Easily Builds backlinks on auto-pilot to multiple tiers
    Never have to setup long schedules or extensive campaigns again
    Are you taking advantage of the Sick Agent yet?
    Thanks 1buckplr thanked for this post

  3. #4
    Expired/Coder


    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    2,554
    Reputation Points
    6003
    Mentioned in
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    384
    Thanks (Received)
    533
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Packets should be 100% dupe free and successful on the day that they are uploaded. It is natural that the success rate will deteriorate based on skill with Sick and changes to the forum but that is natural and expected.
    Thanks 1buckplr thanked for this post

  4. #5
    Senior Member/Coder

    Vilo runs:

    Sick Submitter

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bratislava, Slovakia
    Posts
    588
    Reputation Points
    1961
    Mentioned in
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    82
    Thanks (Received)
    171
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    1buckplr, lilbeewee,

    you both guys have your share of truth. while i see no benefit in submitting here a raw scrape of 200 SMF sites where only 14 really work, with directories it´s a completely different story as the submission success very much depends on the category the sites fits in. An "ARTS" related site will have 50%+ success while "noetics" related one probably fails at 0.03%.

    Living and dupe free is a must. [EDIT] (caps removed to look more as I know what I am writing):
    and i very much insist on malware free lists too. Pls run your lists with scrapebox malware and phishing filter prior to submitting, please![/EDIT]
    Last edited by Vilo; 03-03-2011 at 04:59 PM.
    SICK my DUCK, dear competitors!
    Thanks markf, 1buckplr thanked for this post

  5. #6



    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,407
    Reputation Points
    9328
    Mentioned in
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    977
    Thanks (Received)
    818
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Hi

    Please rest assured, this was not directed at anyone who has replied in this thread.

    I am experienced enough to understand about the directories, and other things such as that.

    Specifically, if you want to upload a packet, at least run the packet first and remove the dead sites.

    If this doesnt apply to you then do not worry. If you have checked your packets before uploading, then this is not directed at you.
    Professional Premium Templates
    Ultimate Template Collection


  6. #7
    Expired/Coder


    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    2,554
    Reputation Points
    6003
    Mentioned in
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    384
    Thanks (Received)
    533
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vilo View Post
    Living and dupe free is a must. AND I VERY MUCH INSIST ON MALWARE FREE LISTS TOO. Pls run your lists with scrapebox malware and phishing filter prior to submitting, PLEASE!
    Not everyone has or can get SB so this is not possible. Plus, SB is far less than 100% accurate. It's your job to make sure that you system is secured. That said, obviously if someone gets a virus from a packet they should try to determine which site it came from and remove it.

  7. #8
    Senior Member/Coder

    Vilo runs:

    Sick Submitter

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bratislava, Slovakia
    Posts
    588
    Reputation Points
    1961
    Mentioned in
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged in
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks (Given)
    82
    Thanks (Received)
    171
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Given)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Well, the truth is that I actually never got malware with a packet from someone else. Maybe there are no such packets here.

    With my own scrapes I run into problems occasionally and it slows down the process substantially. I use paid AVAST (home?) version on my PC and few times I´ve got a very resistant piece of malware. I usually use spybot, malwarebytes and combofix to fix the things. Usually only combofix can fix the problems 100%. I am not associated with them and they are a freeware...

    Maybe this can be a future feature of sick just like SB I think there are few APIs that can be used.
    SICK my DUCK, dear competitors!

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •